
amateur
amateur (àm´e-tûr´,
-ter, -e-ch¢r´, -cher, -ty¢r´) noun
1.Abbr. a., A. A person
who engages in an art, a science, a study, or an athletic activity as a
pastime rather than as a profession.
2.Abbr. a., A. Sports. An
athlete who has never participated in competition for money.
3.One lacking the skill
of a professional, as in an art.
adjective
1.Abbr. a., A. Of, relating
to, or performed by an amateur.
2.Abbr. a., A. Made up of
amateurs.
3.Not professional; unskillful.
[French, from Latin amâtor,
lover, from amâre, to love.]
- am´ateurism noun
Synonyms: amateur, dabbler,
dilettante, tyro. The central meaning shared by these nouns is "one engaging
in a pursuit but lacking professional skill": a musician who is a gifted
amateur, not a professional; a dabbler in the graphic arts; a sculptor
but a mere dilettante; a tyro in the art of writing poetry.
Antonyms: professional.
Word History: When Mrs. T.W. Atkinson remarked in her
1863 Recollections of the Tartar Steppes and their Inhabitants, "I am no amateur
of these melons," she used amateur in a sense unfamiliar to us. That sense,
"a lover, an admirer," is, however, clearly descended from the senses of the
word's ultimate Latin source, amâtor, "lover, devoted friend, devotee,
enthusiastic
pursuer of an objective," and from its
immediate
Latin-derived French source, amateur, with a similar range of meanings. First
recorded in English in 1784 with the sense in which Mrs. Atkinson used it, amateur
is found in 1786 with a meaning more familiar to us, "a person who engages in
an art, for example, as a pastime rather than as a profession," a sense that
had already developed in French. Given the limitations of doing something as
an amateur, it is not surprising that the word is soon after recorded in the
disparaging sense we still use to refer to someone who lacks professional skill
or ease in performance.
"My education was of the most ordinary
description, consisting of little more than the rudiments of reading, writing,
and arithmetic at a common day school. My hours out of school were passed
at home and in the streets." Michael Faraday, who had litttle mathematics and
no formal schooling beyond the primary grades, is celebrated as an experimenter
who discovered the induction of
electricity.
He was one of the great founders of modern physics. It is generally acknowledged
that Faraday's ignorance of mathematics contributed to his inspiration, that
it compelled him to develop a simple, nonmathematical concept when he looked
for an explanation of his electrical and magnetic phenomena. Faraday had
two qualitieis that more than made up for his lack of education: fantastic intuition
and independence and originality of mind.
The
internet
is for amateurs. No - that's not an insult, but high praise. 'Amateurs,'
by definition, do what they do for the love of it. Because it's fun, social,
enriching, transformational,
evolutionary,
or even just beautiful. Now that the investment community sees the net is seen
as more of a lame
duck
than a cash cow, the only ones left out here (or the only ones that should be)
are us amateurs.
![]() |
Amateur (1994)
Directed by
Hal
Hartley
Writing credits
Hal Hartley
Genre: Comedy / Crime / Drama / Thriller
Tagline: Accountancy, Murder, Amnesia, Torture,
Ecstasy,
Understanding, Redemption
Cast overview, first billed only:
Isabelle Huppert .... Isabelle
Martin
Donovan .... Thomas
Elina Löwensohn .... Sofia
Damian Young .... Edward
Chuck Montgomery .... Jan
Dave Simonds .... Kurt
Pamela Stewart .... Officer Melville
Erica Gimpel .... Irate Woman
Jan Leslie Harding .... Waitress
Terry Alexander .... Frank, the Cook
Holt McCallany .... Usher
Hugh Palmer .... Warren
Michael Imperioli .... Doorman
at Club
Angel Caban .... Detective
Emmanuel Xuereb .... Bartender
Runtime: USA:105
Country: UK / USA / France
Language:
English
Color: Color
Sound Mix:
Dolby
Certification: USA:R / UK:15 /
Finland:K-16
/ Spain:18 / Sweden:15
![]() |
"Well, these people have clearly
never read Thomas Kuhn's _The Structure of Scientific Revolution_. The only
people who ever advance science forward are the people who come from
the
edge, from the outside, usually amateurs, usually not institutional. The
way scientific advance happens is though completely irrational bursts of brilliance.
Then they create a scenario of careful research and cross-checked data and slow
accumulation. It doesn't happen like that. People are free to dismiss me, I
don't even necessarily say they're wrong. The ideas need to be judged on their
own merit. If they're saying they can't be
true
because I take drugs, that's like saying 'It can't be true because he's a Jew'
or 'It can't be true because he's a homosexual.' These are not sufficient reasons
to dismiss anybody's ideas."
-
Terence
McKenna interview in
_The
Resonance Project_ Magazine issue #3 (1993)