Telex
External
Link
Internal
Link
Inventory
Cache
![]() |
Compressionism
This nOde last
updated April 24th, 2003 and is permanently morphing...
(11 Chuen (Frog) /
19 Pohp - 9/260 - 12.19.10.3.11)

union:
concrescence,
coalescence,
fusion,
merger, mixture
compression
compression (kem-prèsh´en)
noun
1. a. The act or
process
of compressing. b. The state of being compressed.
2. a. The process by which
the working substance in a heat engine, such as the vapor mixture in the
cylinder of an internal-combustion engine, is compressed. b. The engine
cycle during which this process occurs.
- compres´sional adjective
Data Compression
Data Compression, also called
data compaction. In computer science, a term applied to various means of
compacting information for more efficient transmission or storage, used
in such areas as data communication,
database
management systems, facsimile transmission, and CD-ROM publishing. One
common compression technique, called key-word encoding, replaces each frequently
occurring word- such as the or here- with a 2-byte token, thus saving one
or more bytes of storage for every instance of that word in a text file.
Space: Dimensions: Contraction
compression (noun)
compression, pressure, compressure,
compaction, squeeze, squeezing, stenosis, strangulation
constriction, constringency,
astriction, astringency
contractility, contractibility,
compressibility
Other Forms
smallness: compression,
abbreviation, abridgment, contraction
diminution: compression,
squeeze, contraction
joining together: tightening,
astriction, drawing together, contraction, compression, closure
energy: compression, spring,
elasticity
shortening: contraction,
compression
narrowing: narrowing, compression,
contraction
closure: contraction, strangulation,
compression
conciseness: compression,
condensation, telescoping
compendium: contraction,
compression, conciseness
restriction: constriction,
squeeze, compression
retention: squeeze, compression
![]() |
Rupert's
theory is, at this point a hypothesis. There are no equations, there's no predictive
machinery, it's a way of speaking about experimental approaches. My
time
wave thing is like an extremely formal and specific example of what he's
talking about in a general way. And then what Ralph Abraham is doing is providing
a bridge from the kind of things Rupert and I are doing back into the frontier
branch of ordinary mathematics called dynamic modeling. And Frank is an expert
in the repetition of
fractal
process.
He can show you the same thing happening on many, many levels, in many, many
different expressions. So I have named us Compressionists, or
Psychedelic
Compressionists. A Compressionism holds that the world is growing more and more
complex, compressed, knitted together, and therefore holographically complete
at every point, and that's basically where the four of us stand, I think, but
from different points of view.
![]() |
![]() |
p.88
The nucleus of a cell is
equivalent in volume to 2-millionths of a pinhead. The two-yard thread
of
DNA
packs into this minute volume by coiling up endlessly on itself, thereby
reconciling extreme length and
infinitesimal
smallness, like mythical serpents. The average human being is made
up of 100 thousand billion cells, according to some estimates. This
means that there are approximately 125 billion miles of DNA in a human
body - corresponding to 70 round-trips between Saturn and the
Sun.
You could travel your entire life in a Boeing 747
flying
at top speed and you would not even cover one hundredth of the distance.
Your personal DNA is long enough to wrap around the earth 5 million times.
Jeremy Narby -
_Cosmic
Serpent - DNA And The Origins Of Knowledge
![]() |
[...] For really what I come to believe about the
psychedelic
experience that it is a compressed instance of what we call understanding...
so that living psychedelically is trying to live in an atmosphere of continous
unfolding of understanding so that every day you know more and see into things
with greater depth than you did before...
![]() |
![]() |
This is a
process
of
education.
What the psychedelic experience is it's the process of education so compressed
that it has become a cascade of actual visual images which, rather than a kind
of slow unfoldment of linked
perception,
but really,
attention
to attention and appreciation of the
immediate.
-
Terence
McKenna - _Nature Is The Center Of The
Mandala
Part 2_ MP3 (32k)
(44:12)
"keep it dense. keep it
in-tense."
fuck, okay. "you are what you cache". or, to codify it:
REMEMBER, you are what you cache". taking this form, we bring as much as we can with us (pack rats), but the problem with clutter is that it's bulky. not very efficient.
![]() |
![]() |
to streamline, we
digitize.
paper, images, sound, etc. there's a ton of
information
in hi resolution images and sound. but storage and
processing
power is growing and so far has no limits.
brute force is not a problem. but in the meantime, and this is exemplified by slim systems like palmtops, embedded systems, "elegant coding" for pda's, etc. demos.. this is all training for elegant, efficient, schemes.. but for what... compressions....(!)
this is the key. we are
compressing
time.
we are
fractally
involutingly sinking into a
wormhole
and in order for a tight squeeze you have to compress.. that's right.
so this whole thing about compression schemes and compression algorithms.
![]() |
minidiscs, etc. you want pure? go brute force.
you want the "gist"? the main information?
go pkzip. and pk could be psychokenesis,
right?
fuckin a.
so this is where we're
at.
compressions. the gist of it.
we all interpret differently
anyway, and pure reps don't amount to much because we all have different
filters.
of course, that IS the optimum and it should be stored SOMEWHERE.
like the idea that, atomjack, at oct 14 1998 4:55 pm should remain pure
in that form. but to go elsewhere with it? do i need everything?
do i need all the unnecesasry baggage? or can i leave it at home
on the server where i can access those things i need with my pda?
this is compression.
this is compressing time. this is one step closer to fucking
immortality
and i'm going to get there and bring everyone along with me. scratch
that, everyone is ALREADY there.
Digging Deep Into Compression
By Mark K. Anderson
2:00 a.m. Feb. 6, 2002 PST
Unless
tea
leaves or crystal balls are involved, predicting the future is typically a matter
of finding patterns in the past.
While there are many approaches today to pattern recognition and matching, two clever techniques have recently found new applications from hurricane and earthquake forecasting to analyzing authorship of texts and making sophisticated search engines.
The first involves the seemingly unrelated task of file
compression -- as performed in applications such as WinZip and StuffIt -- while
the other borrows its lessons from the world of
chaos
,
complexity theory and
fractals.
In the Jan. 28 issue of the
journal Physical Review Letters, three Italian scientists used the Unix
compression program gzip on text files to address such pattern-matching
issues as
language
of composition and authorship.
Since data compression entails recognizing and tagging repeated strings, the more repeated internal patterns that a file or collection of files has, the more it can be compressed. Thus, if one wants to know the language in which file X was written, just compress it with files whose language is known and then compare how efficiently each operation is carried out.
If, by comparing raw and compressed file sizes, one finds that X plus an Italian text file zips tighter than X plus a French text or X plus an English text or X plus one's other linguistic reference texts, then congratulazioni! You've likely just found the language of X without even opening it.
The scientists -- Dario Benedetto,
Emanuele Caglioti and Vittorio Loreto of Rome's La Sapienza University
-- used this technique to discern the language of mystery texts as small
as 20 characters. Furthermore, using a
database
of 90 texts from 11 different authors, they found their method could even
pick out individual authors with a success rate of 93 percent.
Search engines, they say, could use this simple technique to categorize their quarry by semantic content and more qualitative categories such as style and readership level.
"I would like to see if this method could distinguish the music of John Lennon from Paul McCartney," Caglioti said.
Ming Li, a professor of computer
science at the University of California in Santa Barbara, developed the
file-compression technique for categorizing genetic datasets. He said he's
impressed
by Benedetto et al.'s work, but he cautioned that the "zip" format leaves
much to be desired.
"For some rough purposes, it's OK," he said. "But for many applications you need a better compression algorithm."
He developed the program GenCompress for his
DNA
pattern-matching problem. In a forthcoming issue of _Scientific American_,
Li Bin Ma of the University
of Waterloo, Canada, and Charles Bennett of IBM
apply the same algorithm on a series of chain letters to divine the historical
evolution
of its text.
At the U.S. Geological Survey, Christopher Barton has been applying a different technique to quantify patterns in datasets.
After two sabbaticals with the "father of fractals" Benoit Mandelbrot, Barton and colleagues at the USGS began using Mandelbrot's mathematical toolkit to analyze such disparate phenomena as Mississippi flooding, hurricane landfalls and the location of oil and gas deposits.
At last December's meeting of the American Geophysical Union, Barton presented recent work (PDF) on fractal modeling of the U.S. coastline.
His presentation was part of a larger effort by the AGU to incorporate more fractal geometry -- the study of fragmented patterns nested within larger copies of themselves -- into geology and geophysics.
Barton is publishing a free USGS book and CD-ROM later this year on fractal modeling of hurricane windspeeds. He said fractals have enabled his team to predict natural phenomena with unprecedented accuracy.
"Mandelbrot has created a mathematical approach that allows us to quantify complex patterns without having to simplify them," said Barton.
"As Mandelbrot now says, fractals are the 'science of roughness.'"
At today's rates of compression,
you could download the entire 3 billion digits of your
DNA
onto about four CDs. That 3-gigabyte genome sequence represents the prime coding
information
of a human body — your life as numbers. Biology, that
pulsating
mass of plant and animal flesh, is conceived by science today as an information
process.
As computers keep shrinking, we can
imagine
our complex bodies being numerically condensed to the size of two tiny cells.
These micro-
memory
devices are called the egg and sperm. They are packed with information.
That life might be information, as biologists propose, is far more intuitive than the corresponding idea that hard matter is information as well. When we bang a knee against a table leg, it sure doesn't feel like we knocked into information. But that's the idea many physicists are formulating.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |