![]() |

singularity (sîng´gye-làr´î-tê)
noun
plural singularities
1. The quality or condition of being
singular.
2. A trait marking one as distinct
from others; a peculiarity.
3. Something uncommon or unusual.
4. Astrophysics. A point in space-time
at which
gravitational
forces
cause matter to have
infinite
density and infinitesimal volume, and space and
time
to become infinitely distorted.
5. Mathematics. A point at which
the derivative does not exist for a given function of a random variable but
every neighborhood of which contains points for which the derivative exists.
In this sense, also called singular point.
singularity: A region of spacetime
where spacetime curvature becomes so strong that the general relativistic
laws
break down and the laws of
quantum
gravity
take over. If one tries to describe a singularity using general relativity alone,
one finds (incorrectly) that tidal gravity and spacetime curvature are infinitely
strong there. Quantum gravity probably replaces these infinities by quantum
foam.
There's a universe of potential, Lindsay, think of that. No rules, no limits.
-
Bruce
Sterling - _Schis
matrix_
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
604 release _Singularity_ compilation CD on
Flying
Rhino
![]() |
Vernor Vinge coined the term in
the book, _Marooned in
Real
Time_
from:
http://www.extropy.com/~exi/faq/singul.html
What is the Singularity?
Human history has been characterized
by an accelerating rate of technological progress. It is caused by a positive
feedback
loop. A new technology, such as agriculture, allows an increase in population.
A larger population has more brains at work, so the next technology is
developed or discovered more quickly. We expect that this growth rate will
slow down as some fundamental limits (the speed of
light,
Planck's
constant, etc.) are approached. This implies that there will be a time
at which technological progress will be most rapid. This is a singular
event in the sense that it happens once in human history.
Vernor Vinge, who popularized
the concept in his book _Marooned in Real
Time_
has a different definition. The pace of progress became very rapid, and
then at some point mankind simply disappeared (as far as humans who missed
the event by being in stasis too long could tell). He implied that they
ascended to a more sophisticated level of existence. So that time horizon
when we can no longer say anything useful about the future is Vinge's Singularity.
One would expect that his version of the Singularity would recede in time as time goes by, i.e. the horizon moves with us.
Singularity, the Seed
![]() |
The singularity is an incomprehensibly
small point which contains a near
infinite
amount of densely packed
information.
The singularity is a mathematical paradox because it is infinitely massive
yet infinitely small. Its
gravitational
field is so dense that it causes space and
time
to bend, freeze, and reverse around the edges. Singularities are
only found in
black
holes, subatomic nuclei, and in the first few nanoseconds of
our early universe. The symbol for singularity is a single dot or
one-dimensional point.
Any information entering
a singularity instantly collapses under such
intense
pressure that it becomes encrypted within a mathematical paradox. From
our perspective, the singularity is a one-way information valve.
Any information entering a singularity is impossible to retrieve. Not even
light
can escape. Whatever goes in is
compressed
into ‘not-being’ and spit across a no-return hole in spacetime. Some theorists
believe this information is just locked into the black
hole forever; some say it will eventually evaporate away into particle
decay.
Einstein
and Rosen theorized that singularities could even be
wormholes
to alternate
dimensions
of
reality.
Unfortunately, no one will ever know because the
compression
makes it impossible to survive the journey.
![]() |
The singularity of the early universe also represents the star seed, a hard-shelled courier of self-replicating, viral information. From this single seed, an entire universe erupted.
Because the singularity contains
the
infinite
within the small, it can only begin to grow in a void that is big enough
to hold it. This is true with all seeds. Each seed contains vast
potential – but a seed can only germinate in very specific conditions.
The seed metaphor also exists in the dimension of pure idea. Any single idea can seed an infinite number of new ideas, but seeds of idea will only germinate in very particular conditions.
Like the singularity, the seed of
idea seeks a
silent,
uncluttered place to plant its roots and become fully formed. In many theologies,
the initial seed is not a theoretical object, it is simply God’s idea to fill
the eternal void of loneliness.
The
chakra
which relates to the singularity is located between the navel and the pelvic
bone. This point is not only the “essential” center of your being, it is
also your center of
gravity
and the central furnace of your ki, the life
force
which
flows
through you and animates your body. The body position which corresponds
to the seed is a tightly held tuck. Pull your knees up to your chin,
roll your face down, and curl up into a ball. When you exhale, collapse
and let your energy sink deeper and deeper into your central furnace.
- James Kent - _The Galactic
Harmonic
Primer_
book _The Spike: Accelerating Into The Unimaginable Future_ by Damien Broderick
And what of the arrival of the Singularity
itself? What can be said of its actual appearance? Since it involves an intellectual
runaway, it will probably occur faster than any technical revolution seen so
far... If
networking
is widespread enough (into
ubiquitous
embedded systems), it may seem as if our artifacts as a whole had suddenly wakened.
And what happens a month or two (or a day or two) after that? I have only analogies
to point to: The rise of humankind. We will be in the Post-Human era.
![]() |
![]() |
From the human point of view this change will be a throwing away of all the previous rules, perhaps in the blink of an eye, an exponential runaway beyond any hope of control. Developments that before were thought might only happen in "a million years" (if ever) will likely happen in the next century.
- Vernor Vinge
"Since ... an ultra intelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an `intelligence explosion' ... more probable than not ... within the 20th century." I.J.Good, 1965
`Within thirty years, we will have
the technological means to create superhuman intelligence. Shortly after, the
human era will be ended.' (Vernor Vinge, ![]()
VISION-21
Symposium, 1993)
Fact One about the Singularity:
It happens to everyone and it will happen to us. Fact Two about
the Singularity: Singularities are rapid and complete. Or rather, the second
stage of Singularity is rapid. First, and slower, is Singularity::Horizon, when
the first
transhuman
(or a specialist, transhuman in at least one area) begins complicating history.
Progress accelerates, wealth fluctuates upwards, social fabrics rupture, and
the threat of nanowar makes nuclear annihilation look sane. (A quick-kill Singularity
via AI avoids these dangers.) Pleasant or unpleasant for the race, the Horizon
can continue for a generation. Then the first transhumans produce their
successors. It usually takes under a year of Far Horizon to code a self-enhancing
or "seed" AI, which begins the second stage: Singularity::Transcend, a.k.a.
the Techno-Rapture or Final Dawn.
Transcendence occurs when the cycle of positive
feedback
- smarter intelligences building superintelligences, superintelligences rebuilding
themselves - takes off, on a software level, and doesn't stop. The entire
process
can take a fraction of a second, and the seed can be far less than human.
Runaway positive feedback defines the Singularity, whether it's the slow two-step
loop
of technology and intelligence ("Horizon"), or the incredibly rapid closure
of self-enhancement ("Transcend"). Positive feedback rewriting the equation
describing the feedback.
![]() |
Fact Three about the Singularity:
Singularities don't leave much of Life As We Know It behind. A common
cognitive fault is asking how the Singularity will alter our world.
To deal with the unknown, we export our default assumptions and simulate
the imagined change. But to argue about life after Singularity, you must
be able to program your argument into a blank-slate
AI.
Default assumptions don't exist in a vacuum. Defaults originate as observed
norms, and norms are the abstracted result of a vast network of causality.
These causal chains ultimately ground in
evolution,
the macroscopic laws of physics, or mortal game theory. None of these principles
survive. Evolution is sometimes superior to intelligent design, but
not superintelligent design. Dictates imposed by evolution will be
annulled by superior
force.
Macroscopic physics is hideously
wasteful: A
basketball
in flight uses septillions of
quantum-computing
elements to perform a simple integral.
Once the system collapses into a simulated
basketball
plus an octillion teraflops, it won't revert to the previous method. Game
theory... regardless of whether super-agents can predict each other's actions,
will there be conflicting goals? Or limited resources? Or more than one abstractable
agent? Our world is too deeply grounded in stupidity
to survive superintelligence. We may make it to the
Other Side of Dawn, but human civilization won't.
Our bodies, our stupidity, our physics, and our society will evaporate.
Singularity debates center around six core questions. "Will the Singularity
really happen?" "Can the Singularity be avoided?" "What will life be like
after the Singularity?" I hope that my answers to the first three are now
clear: "Yes", "No", and "
Mu".
"Can we really program human-equivalent AIs?" Yes.
The objections fail to consider this: We can cheat. First and foremost,
seed AIs don't have to be human-equivalent. An acorn is not a tree. Second,
we're allowed to steal code from
DNA,
observe developing brains... even build AIs out of human neurons if there's
a fundamental Penrosian gap. Third, if unmodified humans don't rise to
the challenge, that doesn't rule out transhumans or neurosurgically produced
specialists. Coding an AI isn't an ideological argument. If a method works,
we'll use it.
- Eliezer S. Yudkowsky - _Comments On Vinge's Singularity_
As we approach the lip of this cascade
into
concrescence,
novelty, and completion,
time
seems to speed up and
boundaries
begin to dissolve. The more boundaries that dissolve, the closer to the
concrescence we are. When we finally reach it, there will be no boundaries,
only eternity as we become all space and time, alive and dead, here and there,
before and after.
![]() |
![]() |
Because this singularity
can simultaneously co-exist in states that are contradictory, it is something
which transcends rational apprehension. But it gives the universe meaning,
because all
processes
can be seen to be seeking and moving in an effort to approximate, connect
with, and append to this transcendental object at the end of time.
![]() |
One way of thinking about
it is to compare it to one of those mirrored disco balls, which sends out
thousands of reflections off of everybody and everything in the room. The
mirrored disco ball is the transcendental object at the end of time, and
those reflected twinkling, refractive
lights
are religions, scientific theories, gurus, works of art, poetry, great
orgasms, great souffles, great paintings, etc. Anything that has, in
Nietszche's
phrase, the "spark of divinity within it," is in fact, referent to the
original
force
of the spark of all divinity unfolding itself within the confines of three-dimensional
space.
-
Terence
McKenna -
_Timewave
Zero And
Language_
The transcendent other casts an
enormous shadow across the lower
dimensional
landscape of
time.
The stirring of the earliest life forms in the Devonian seas caught the call
and every step that has been taken since then has been ever quicker, ever quicker
toward the transcendental other, it beckons us and history is haunted by this
thing. History is the shock
wave
of
eschatology.
History is a process that lasts, let's be generous, 25,000 years, the wink of
an eye in geological time, and in that 25,000 years religions rise and fall,
governmental systems, teachers come and go and there is a sense of being caught
in a whirlpool that is spinning us toward
fusion
with the un
imaginable.
This is why the skies of Earth are haunted by flying saucers, they aren't coming
from other solar systems, they are scintillas, remember this alchemical term
- sparks - they are scintillas being thrown off the alchemical quintessence
which lies like a great
attractor
at the end of time and the purpose of science and techni and electronic media
and
information
transfer and all of this stuff is to knit us together, to
dissolve
our boundaries and to bring us to a point of singularity where
language
fails, where we lean over meanings' edge and feel the dizziness of things unsaid.
- Terence McKenna from a
lecture on
Alchemy
![]() |
![]() |
(A very
intense
man is talking in his office, gesturing wildly)
If we're looking at the
highlights of human development, you have to look at the
evolution
of the organism, and then at the development of its interaction with the
environment. Evolution of the organism begins with the evolution of life,
proceeds through the hominid, coming to the evolution of mankind: Neanderthal
and Cro-magnon man. Now interestingly, what you're looking at here are
three strains: biological, anthropological -- development of the cities
-- and culture, which is human expression.
Now what you've seen here is
the evolution of populations, not so much the evolution of individuals. And
in addition, if you look at the
time
scales that are involved here, two billion years for life, six million years
for the hominid, 100,000 years for mankind as we know it, you're beginning to
see the telescopic nature of the evolutionary timeline. And then when you get
to agriculture, when you get to scientific revolution and industrial revolution,
you're looking at 10,0000 years, 400 years, 150 years, and you're seeing a further
telescoping of this evolutionary time. What that means is that as we go through
the new evolution, it's going to telescope to the point we should be able to
manifest it within our lifetime, within a generation.
![]() |
The new evolution stems
from
information.
And it stems from two types of information,
digital
and analog. The digital is
artificial
intelligence, the analog results from molecular biology, the cloning
of the organism, and you knit the two together with neurobiology. Before,
on the old evolutionary paradigm, one would die and the other would grow
and dominate. But under the new paradigm, they would exist as a mutually
supportive, non-competitive grouping, independent from the external.
And what's interesting
here is that evolution now becomes an individually centered
process
emanating from the needs and desires of the individual, and not an external
process, a passive process, where the individual is just at the whim of
the collective. So you produce a neo-human, okay, with a new individuality,
a new consciousness. But that's only the beginning of the evolutionary
cycle, because as the next cycle proceeds, the input is now this new intelligence.
As intelligence piles on intelligence, as ability piles upon ability, the
speed changes. Until what? Until we reach a crescendo. In a way, it could
almost be
imagined
as an almost instantaneous fulfillment of human and neo-human potential.
It could be something totally different. It could be the amplification
of the individual, the multiplication of individual existences. Parallel
existences. Now with the individual no longer restricted by time and space.
And the manifestations
of this neo-human type evolution, the manifestations could be dramatically
counter-intuitive. That's the interesting part. The old evolution is cold,
it's sterile, it's efficient, and its manifestations are those of social
adaptation: we're talking about parasitism, dominance, morality, war, predation.
These will be subject to de-emphasis. These will be subject to de-evolution.
The new evolutionary paradigm will give us the human traits of
truth,
of loyalty, of justice, of freedom. These will be the manifestations of
the new evolution. And that is what we would hope to see. Yes, that would
be nice.
- film
_Waking
Life_ directed by Richard Linklater
pOrtals:
Singularity
Watch
The Singularity at
Future,
c/o Kheper
